Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Art News
If you like what you see here, tell two people about us, and link to us if you can.
You are here: Home Art News Nonstarving Artists Adel Abdessemed, Don't Trust Me Opens at SFAI
 
Document Actions

Adel Abdessemed, Don't Trust Me Opens at SFAI
Email to Colleague More Art News
by Poor Richard last modified Mar 26, 2008 04:28 PM


March 19th San Francisco Art Institute invites the public to the opening reception for "Don’t Trust Me", a solo exhibition of new work by Paris-based artist Adel Abdessemed. A follow-up to his segment—the video projection God Is Design—in last year’s group exhibition Wherever We Go (also at SFAI’s Walter and McBean Galleries), Don’t Trust Me will mark Abdessemed’s West Coast solo debut. Including a site-specific performative event to be devised extempore, the exhibition features a slate of extremely short but provocative videos.

Adel Abdessemed, Don't Trust Me Opens at SFAI

Adel Abdessemed, Don¹t Trust Me, 2008. Video still. Courtesy of the artist and David Zwirner Gallery.

[Read the Editorial: Death for No Reason]

 

 

Looped cuts of only a few seconds, the videos offer up gestures and facts, but resist the imposition of narrative constructions or automatic interpretations (whether of the empirically unambiguous or the theoretically savvy kind). The tacit claims for “autonomy” made by such visual language—staccato forms, lights, movements, and immediate experiences—imbue the work with an instantaneous efficiency that circumvents categorization, making typical moral and cultural constraints seem beside the point. Don’t Trust Me portrays six animals—a sheep, a horse, an ox, a pig, a goat, and a doe—being struck and killed by a hammer. Each killing occurs so quickly that it’s difficult to determine definitively what has happened. Do these incidents represent slaughter or sacrifice? What are their social, cultural, moral, and political implications? Or are such questions now verging on irrelevance, as if something else altogether were taking place (or about to), something wholly other, unforeseen, unexpected?
 

Fawn
Adel Abdessemed, Don¹t Trust Me, 2008. Video still. Courtesy of the artist and David Zwirner Gallery.

At once intimate and spectacular, Abdessemed’s work aims to convert the banal into the dramatic. Transforming everyday materials and images into unexpected and sometimes shocking expressions, his inventive gestures, as if by alchemy, work to undo dominant modes of perception and entrenched sociocultural norms—they work, in short, to generate new relevance for radical ideas and actions. Actively defying social, cultural, moral, and religious taboos, Abdessemed contrives to subvert common sense and knowledge, received wisdom, and established biopolitical systems.
 
Within a wide range of media—drawing, video, photography, performance, and installation—Abdessemed’s artistic language is economical and straightforward; his range of references is open and generous, sensitive albeit controversial. For materials, he relies on bodily or embodied experiences (human and animal), ordinary household objects, industrial products, and even buildings. His work consists of the stark contrasts between beauty and violence, impulsiveness and rationality, romanticism and radicality, life and death.
 
Abdessemed’s belief in revolution, both social and individual, is manifest throughout his work—a belief whose motive can in part be taken from the trajectory of his own life. Born in 1971 in Algeria, he immigrated to France in the mid-90s during a period of intense internal conflict in his native country. In France, he quickly met with what he came to react against as the racism and ideological presumption that underlie—often in the form of “soft” fascism—late-capitalist manipulations of power and political corruption. Guided by the example of such oppositional figures as Frantz Fanon, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Antonio Gramsci, and Jacques Rancière, Abdessemed has strategically utilized the “system,” ironically and critically, to make his claims visible and audible, thereby provoking public discussion.
 
Abdessemed studied at the École des Beaux-Arts d’Alger as well as at the École Nationale des Beaux-Arts de Lyon. He participated in the 2001 P.S.1 International Studio Program (MoMA) in New York, where he also exhibited. He has had solo exhibitions at Le Magasin—Centre National d’Art Contemporain in Grenoble, France (2008); P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center (MoMA) (2007–2008); Le Plateau in Paris (2006); and FRAC Champagne-Ardenne in Reims, France (2004). In 2006, Abdessemed was among the participants in Notre Histoire, an exhibition of emerging French artists at the Palais de Tokyo in Paris.


intentional cruelty in the name of art?

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 21, 2008 02:08 AM
No artistic purpose justifies violence and cruelty towards other sentient beings no matter how thick the pseudo-intellectual smoke screen is fabricated around it. I am an artist and designer myself and an instructor at art school in San Francisco and I oppose censorship but this is just beyond justification.

Disgusting indeed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 22, 2008 02:26 AM
It is a sad day for our culture when this passes for art.

Deplorable

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 21, 2008 02:54 PM
Completely disgusting

Where is the artistic value in this?

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 21, 2008 07:49 PM
I saw this exhibit, and it reminded me of some video taken at a hog farm, where workers were shown dropping cinder blocks on the heads' of pigs for entertainment. It really was no different than Mr. Abdessemed’s obviously staged video sequences.
You can see some of the video here: http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming.asp

Dear Anonymous User posting goveg link

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
The BIG difference, all happens in one key word of your post, "staged!" Abdessemed killed animals for art. That is the difference.

awful

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 22, 2008 02:26 AM
i am a student at sfai, i saw this today i think its aboslutely horrible. its just cruelty for crueltys sake and i think its really awful

:/

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 23, 2008 10:09 PM
I am also a student at our school and I am saddened that you cannot see past your own views and morals.

Funny thing to be sad about, all things considered.

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 24, 2008 03:08 PM
Our country is one that facilitates the embracing of many viewpoints. It is also, however, based upon the premise that one's rights only extend so far that they do not obstruct someone else's rights. This video was created by ending another being's life. The person you are responding to is seeing past themself. They are seeing the 6 animals (at least) that were killed in the making of these videos. I do not believe it is wrong to make the assumption that a life ended is not worth a video. I say this as a video artist. Art ends where sociopathy begins.

rationalization of the empty artist

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
hmm...would it be art if you or someone you love were killed by a hammer to the head on video? really, how can you rationalize it? are you an artist or just someone who really craves attention? stupid.

Funny thing to be sad about, all things considered.

Posted by Anonymous User at Apr 03, 2008 05:21 PM
"I say this as a pretentious asshat. Art ends where sociopathy begins."


fixed it for ya!

: \

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
It gives me hope that more people do not think that bypassing their own views and morals is the proper way to channel the emotional impact of someone else's artistic expression.
I'm sure that Ed Gein thought that his lampshade made of human skin had some sort of artistic merit, but I'm also pretty sure that it was a good thing that not everyone else felt that it was okay for Mr. Gein to choose to express himself in that way.
Yeah, I just compared a serial killer of human beings to a dude who films the slaughter of animals. If your views are broad enough, you might see that there actually are people in the world who feel that the killing of animals for artistic expression is not cool. Also if you suspend your own moral stance on that issue, you might see what they're trying to say.

Don't trust me exhibit of animal slaughter

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
To the art student that complained people "are not seeing past their morals". Why would someone want to in this obvious case!

Adel Abdessemed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 23, 2008 12:54 AM
Adel Abdessemed must go to prison and never be released again.

????

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 23, 2008 02:06 PM
This is not art this is cruel and disgusting. I hope you can get a hammer sledged to your head you sick freak. To make another thing suffer for your so called art work. Bullshit.... I hope you get whats coming to you you sick freak.

When SNUFF becomes art

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 23, 2008 02:06 PM
When snuff becomes "fine art", we all lose. It represents how SICK our society has become. Why don't they just show video tapes of those sick films sold all over China about this girl impaling live kittens and puppies with her high heel shoes--yes, impaling them, usually in the eyeball, and they scream in agony. Is this called "art" to them?

Revolting

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 24, 2008 07:47 PM
This is blatant animal abuse, nothing more. How this barbaric and sadistic act can pass as art is beyond comprehension.

Don't Trust Me

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
Don't worry Adel, no one trusts a criminal like you. That any respectable museum or cultural organization should agree to promote this monstrosity only proves that Adel is not the only sick fuck around. Very alarming. Pity the victims.

The man is a monster

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
This is so cruel and awful. I would like to see all funds pulled from everything associated with SFAI. I am sicked. Where is PETA?

keeping your opinions in perspective

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 10:55 PM
Please remember that the students are affected by 'pulling all funds' from sfai and the students have no association with the exhibitions that are curated in the McBean gallery. The students retain their own opinions and have been disrupted from their education by threats, etc. The student-run Diego Rivera Gallery had to be closed also, which means the student work currently being exhibited suffers as well. Please leave the students out of this.

Death For No Reason

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
My heart cries out for these animals that were maliciously killed for the sake of someone trying to gain notoriety and fame. It is amazing how some humans think it is their God given right to do whatever it is they want to animals. Animals have feelings just like we humans do except not all the ugly ones. They feel happiness, sadness, fear, pain. It saddens me to think that anyone at all would find this entertaining or consider it art. I hope justice will be served for those helpless animals that gave their lives. I would rather have seen photographs taken of them by Mr. Abdessemed grazing in a peaceful field of tall grass and flowers with a steam running through it than this. Oh well, he's French, what do you expect?

'Don't Trust this FREAK"

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
Totally revolting and this sick freak should go to prison. No reputable gallery should let this monster display these cruel videos. He is showing the worst in himself and in humanity. How sad.
How about we bash his brains in and make a video in the name of art?

DON'T TRUST ME EXHIBIT

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
WHERE IS THE NEAREST TOILET, SO THAT I CAN THROW UP? JUST AS THE OTHER COMMENT SAID, I, TOO AM OPPOSED TO CENSORSHIP, BUT THIS HAS "NO" JUSTIFICATION FOR ANYTHING. I'M AN ANIMAL ACTIVIST, AN ARTIST, AND A VEGAN. WHAT'S NEXT ~ BLUNGEONING A HUMAN FOR ART WORK?

SFAI Show

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
The beating and murder of humans has already been presented as artwork numerous times. In fact, the Whitney Biennial, '93 or '94, exhibited as art the video of Rodney King being beaten.

SFAI show

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 29, 2008 05:41 PM
The obvious difference here is that the artist did not stage the beating of another sentient being, in this case Rodney King, and instead use an observed news incident.

Just sad and wrong!!

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
Just add him to the ongoing list of people that abuse animals!! This is a sick, sick world!

Adel Abdessemed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 25, 2008 04:57 PM
This is disgusting and cruel. It does not matter how you try to sugarcoat this and analyze it, it is nothing more than someone getting off on violently killing animals and filming it. It is sad and pathetic that the members of this gallery sunk to such a level that they found it worth exhibiting. I am an artist and I lived in San Francisco for a long time. I am not a conservative afraid to look at the world outside the box, but this is not art, it is murder and violence and to try and see the artistic expression in it is vile and base. Should we videotape some babies being raped and talked about the moral and artistic and lighting effects. This person is sick and not an artist, but someone that gets off on killing. Now he gets to watch it over and over again and gets the added rise of having other people watch it. If I were associated with the SF Art Institute or Walter & McBean Galleries I would not be able to show my face for supporting such acts of violence and encouraging people to view them. The Andy Warhol Foundation has sunk to new and pathetic lows.

what is this? !&*+

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 07:34 PM
I am speechless.... how can this be allowed? who signed off on this? Holy Moly!

awful

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 08:55 PM
this isn't art at all.

for mother

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 08:55 PM
This is wrong. I wonder what he would say if someone videotaped his mother being gang raped and played it in an 'art' museum, if he would be okay with it just because the videographer called it art?

for mother

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 08:55 PM
This is fucked up. What twisted person thinks it's okay to abuse living beings. I wonder, if someone were to videotape his mother being gang rape and played it in an 'art' museum, would he be okay with that, since the videographer called it art?

What can we do to punish this man?

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
Your comment about filming the gang rape of his mother and calling it art was spot on!

Adel Show

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
Why are you suggesting violence towards the artist's mother? Is that constructive? Or appropriate?

re: mom

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
really? you don't see the connection?

Don't trust me

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 10:55 PM
This is NOT ART. This is a contemptible, cheap, manipulative and base use of sensationalism to shock people and appeal to the worst side of human nature. The senseless and brutal murder of six animals with a hammer is not art. It is just cruelty and exploitation of the public, not to mention the animals murdered. The artist is a perverse capitalist using shock to make a buck, while acting out his sadistic desire to publicly display shadenfreude. Why not molest a child, rape a woman or snuff a teenager runaway and make more money by calling it art? There are limits. This crossed the boundary of human decency.

Killing as "art"

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 10:55 PM
Here is an example of sociopathic intellectual elitism at its "finest". I've rarely been more sickened by the depths to which human beings (ah, yes, "the Crown of Creation") will sink. This exhibit is an atrocity, the artist is an atrocity, the art community that accepts such bilge as "art" is an atrocity. Dark souls casting dark shadows over an already-too-dark Earth.

Outrageous!

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 10:55 PM
I am so horrendously disgusted that someone would call this person's work spectacular?!?! What?!?!?!?!?!!??! Wake up!!!!!!!! This "person" is a piece of sh*t loser! Tying an innocent animal up to a f***in wall and hitting it with a hammer is now what we call "spectacular" art?!?!?!? Humans are the bane of the Earth's existence. How extremely sad and pathetic!

'Don't Trust Me' exhibit

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 26, 2008 10:55 PM
Is this part of a new trend in the world of art? I just found out this afternoon about this particular exhibit. Considering that this morning I was Informed about this other exhibit http://elperritovive.blogspot.com/]I am beyond incensed.

People can routinely, with little or nor reprise, treat animals as they please. Such animals (noting we are all animals of various species. We call ourselves humans or people. I can only imagine what other animals call us) cannot grass these people up because they do not speak a language that humans can reliably understand, and for this reason (and certain biblical verses), are considered by many to be peripheral creatures that happen to inhabit this world for us to lord over. The moment an animal does protest in a way that humans can understand, they are immediately killed. Shame that being human and being humaine have little or no actual connection.

Sorry. Rant over.

Hippophagie

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
LUTTE CONTRE L'HIPPOPHAGIE

NON ! UN CHEVAL CA NE SE MANGE PAS !

Obtenez un autocollant gratuit en écrivant à :
AEC
Résidence La Pléiade
98, rue de Canteleu
59000 LILLE

Joindre une enveloppe timbrée pour le retour du courrier.

Merci aussi de visiter les sites :

http://petitiononline.com/1703ab/petition.html

http://www.chez.com/hippophagie

http://www.dailymotion.com/[…]/xan6v_hippophagie

http://www.mysanantonio.com/[…]/index.html

http://www.reseaulibre.net/rage/video3.html

Faites passer le message à vos amis.

Amitiés.

AEC.

Awful

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
"It" is awful, monstrous and disgusting. "It" is not art but evil. Adel Abdessemedis is just a sociopath, just a killer.
How could the SFAI support that man ?
This is unbelievable.
This is a shame.
This is the death of art, the death of human.

Awful

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
"It" is awful, monstrous and disgusting. "It" is not art but evil. Adel Abdessemedis is just a sociopath, just a killer.
How could the SFAI support that man ?
This is unbelievable.
This is a shame.
This is the death of art, the death of human.

Don't Trust Me Exhibit

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
You all might want to consider the issue of context prior to further judgement. What is the context of the videos here? We don't know- the artist refuses to engage it, probably for the exact reasons evident here- you all become outraged and begin a dialogue about it. Does that make it good art? No. I personally don't like the show at all. It's easy and sensationalistic. But consider this- had the artist qualified his videos with a statement suggesting "my work is a virtual representation of the daily mass-slaughter of innocent creatures that our self-indulgent, excessive, and cruel capitalist society propagates...", what then would your opinions be of the show? Would there be the outrage? Would anyone have cared or noticed? Animal rights activists should be championing this show- I'm a student on campus and I've seen this show generate a lot of dialogue about issues of consumption, slaughter, etc. by people who otherwise paid the subjects no mind. Either think about these things a bit more, or don't take the bait.

PS- The "starving dog" show link above is an entirely different matter. That's active cruelty and has no place in a gallery context.

Reply to Anonymous Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
Anonymous said: "had the artist qualified his videos with a statement suggesting "my work is a virtual representation of the daily mass-slaughter of innocent creatures that our self-indulgent, excessive, and cruel capitalist society propagates...", what then would your opinions be of the show? Would there be the outrage? Would anyone have cared or noticed? Animal rights activists should be championing this show- I'm a student... blah blah blah... Either think about these things a bit more, or don't take the bait"


You are so full of pretentious shit!

A GOOD "virtual representation" would not require the actual killing or hurting of any animal.

It's obvious by the reaction to this exhibit that a lot of people "think about these things" to such an extent that they even consider the individual animals used in the making of Abdessemed’s video (unlike you).

It's you who took the "bait"... by being polemic.

Help animals

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:47 PM
Help animals please!

"Don't Trust Me

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 31, 2008 06:25 PM
I am outraged that the San Francisco Art Institute has chosen to sponsor

"Don't Trust Me," which is not a work of art at all, but merely a series of

animal snuff videos that are a great discredit to the Institute's reputation

and standing as an institution of learning and culture.



Animals are living beings who feel and suffer just like we humans -- and we

are no more justified in taking their lives at will than we have the right

to kill another person. Such abuse of animals may elicit horror and disgust

in viewers, but that does not qualify it as art. It takes absolutely no

artistic talent or ability to kill animals, and to call Adel Abdessemed an

"artist" is an insult to every real artist who refuses to rely on violence

and shallow, sensationalistic gimmicks to express his or her vision.



Abdessemed's work is of no artistic value whatsoever, and rather than raise

people's consciousness about the cruelties committed against animals every

day, it will encourage them to accept animal abuse as a way of gaining

attention and notoriety. I urge you, with all due respect, to remove this

deplorable exhibit immediately, and implement a policy explicitly

prohibiting exhibits for which animals were exploited or killed.

!!!!

Posted by Anonymous User at May 01, 2008 12:39 AM
This is so sick !!!
And this man call himself an artist ? it's sad and pathetic.
Are there not enough suffering and animal abuse already ? San Francisco Art Institute should be ashamed to show such an horrible exhibition, and to call it an exhibition.

I'm disgusted...

Abdessamed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
Comment pouvez-vous mettre en scène de telles horreurs. J'espère pour vous, que vous n'avez pas de conscience. Vous êtes une honte pour notre communauté et les principes de notre religion. Je suis triste de constater que vous êtes né en Algérie comme moi. Quel type d'art vous pensez promouvoir. Si la torture et la mise à mort dans de telles conditions que celles mise en scène sur votre lamentable vidéo, est pour vous une oeuvre artistique, alors elle vous vient uniquement du démon. J'ai pitié pour votre salut et Dieu m'est témoin que je suis une musulmane modérée. "Dieu te laisse croire qu'il oublie, mais n'oublie rien".

animal cruelty

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
I would like to know where this cruelty was carried out...if it happened in SF, I am sure that it is in violation of animal cruelty laws, and I am contacting officials for an investigation, in which case Abdessemed should be prosecuted and deported.

Animal Cruelty Show

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
Don't waste your time, this footage was created in Mexico. Entirely legal, done at a location that sells and butchers these animals in the same fashion. I also find it hard to believe that the animals were clobbered and then just thrown into a pile to rot, it is likely that they were eaten.

Art?

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
In my country (Spain) bulls and horses are tortured for cultural purposes. I guess it's the same... shame.
In fact, it's worse: people pay to watch it front row, the animals suffer for hours and it's not performed by one disturbed mind but a bunch of cowards pretending to be brave.
I'd like to see the -almost- unanimous reaction I'm seeing here, against bullfighters.

Stop the exhibition. If you want to see anything like this, come to Spain.

How to make a name for yourself

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
1) Kidnap Abdessemed. *NOTE this must be done extremely covert, or you will be arrested before the fame and money come rolling in. ALSO you must tell NO ONE.

2) Keep him in a remote location preferably soundproof, and secure him.

3) get at least 3 video cameras and set them up as follows. Wide shot: where you can see his whole body. Tight: where you can see just his face. Then super tight: maybe just the mouth, oooh or the eyes.

4) Proceed with the torture, er I mean, uhhh art. You know... Water-boarding (That goes on in the world right? Perfectly legal right George?). Jamming something into his Urethra (preferably jagged). Starving him for weeks on end (Ohhh! Check this, you could do an artsy time-lapse of him slowly wasting away). You get the idea right, just get creative and have fun with it. BUT REMEMBER DON"T KILL HIM.

5) Once you are satisfied with the footage you have obtained, drop his ass off somewhere blindfolded but within where he can get to safety and live to tell the tale.

6) Find a bourgeoisie elitist gallery to promote and validate your artwork. Rich & bored artist types need things like this, in the same way that vampires need blood. Don't worry about criminal or legal gobbledy gook because you will be gettin' MO PAID my friend and you can hire Johnny Cochran or some shit.

7) Spend that cash son! & Hope no one does the same to you in the name of "contemporary" art.

Don't Trust me

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
Don't Trust Me is NOT art. It is a sickening display of cruelty by someone who should be in jail....not prancing around claiming to be an artist.

He is a disgrace to all fine artists.

Death for No Reason

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
This artist's work is indeed disturbing and provocative, but what does that tell us about what we refuse to acknowledge the rest of the time in a world where animals are murdered daily by just such means so they can be consumed as food? The artist did not kill the animals himself, but documented their slaughter...what he has done is reveal the reality of death animals are subjected to by humans all the time that most people hide from themselves. Is he 'getting off' on their demise as some have suggested? I haven't seen the exhibit, but it doesn't sound like these are snuff films. In fact, every comment I've read here suggests that all the viewers are appropriately shocked and appauled...but at what? What ARE the reasons ANY animal should die by human hands? Does it make one iota of difference to the animal if it is killed for food or someone's obscene idea of 'stimulation'? I can't condone this exhibit, anymore than the next person. But it seems to me that the best response from those that find it disgusting for all the RIGHT reasons is to go vegetarian...better yet, vegan. Otherwise, the protestations are meaningless hypocrisy.

animal cruelty

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:21 PM
I am not sure why we are still discussing this issue. When isn't torturing an animal a criminal act? This so-called artist (disgrace to artists)is getting away with the criminal act while we are discussing and scheduling a public hearing. We should be ashamed of ourselves and especially the gallery in San Francisco. Are we now saying that in the name of art, we can kill animals? How about killing humans, would that be ok in the name of arts and would we be discussing the matter? We human beings suck!!
As far as I am concerned that asshole should be killed with sledge hammer as well, give him the taste of his own fruit. Someone like him is danger to society because this person has a violent tendency, and is spreading his ideals. He really needs to serve time for killing 6 lives. It does not matter if they are animal or human.
Please, please punish him for his hideous act, He deserves it.

Cruel if it's art, Great if its for food?

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:47 PM
Sometimes, art is seen as having a higher purpose than food, it is food for the mind. So why then, is it ok to slaughter billions of animals every minute mercilessly to fatten all your citizens so much that the obesity rate is at a disgusting high, but not ok to slaughter one animal for art? Do you feel like puking when you eat your wonderful hot dog everyday?

"don't trust me"

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 03:47 PM
Considering what our country is doing to Iraq and have done to other countries in the past plus all the black ops that we don't know about this art is just humanity in it's rawest form we are all evil it takes an effort to be good so even PETA has a dark side they just make the effort to live beyond it, so in close so make an EFFORT and live beyond your hate and let his art be art.

                             P.S.
             it's just art & it's not forced just don't look at it.

Desperation for attention, but certainly not art....

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 27, 2008 07:03 PM
The SF Institute of Art is sadly sacrificing their credibility along with morality, ethics and social responsibility. Wake up! Only a very sick aberration of a human would call this art. Adel Abdessemed doesn't understand the concept of art if he sees any value in killing innocent, defenseless creatures. It is the lowest form of life that would stoop to such "shock" tactics to get attention in a world they don't belong. It is demeaning to every true artist to in anyway give a voice to the work of this desperate psychopath. What a horrible commentary on what humanity is capable of doing for attention and notoriety. And worse for those who would find anything redeeming in watching such horror.

Don't Trust Me

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
I am a Muslim; I hope to God you are not one of us; shame on you; you should burn in hell (or come back as an animal in a crush video).

Not art

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who is completely sickened and saddened by this sorry excuse for "art". Since when is murder art? He belongs in a mental institution. Forever. Or do we wait until he kills a human before we realize this guy is a wacko?

Miss Directed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
Our ever growing exposure to the enormous number of diverse values and morals on our little planet is pushing our composure and/or tolerance. A “civil” civilization is without perpetrated stupid and tragic violence. We are not there yet. Is this what Adel Abdessemed’s art is about? Well, thank you, but with our constant media input we don’t need to be reminded this fact.

If his art work is to motivate the instantaneous and impulsive “shock-and-awe” written about in his review, then he has succeeded and we who participate are being manipulated like puppets. What is so ingenious about that? Our media does a good job of keeping our adrenalin surging. And if this is all he is trying to do, he will find greater success joining the many individual and corporate power brokers that have us awake all night worrying about our and our children’s future.

Then again, if his motivation is in part his expression of his own life, living with the manipulations of power and political corruption in Algeria and France, his work generates a serious misunderstanding of his impetus. He has failed to communicate. Read the reviews.

May I suggest another profession for Adel: law not art, where he actually could make a significant difference in eradicating the world of violence, un-equal power, and cruelty and exploitation? There are many non-profit organizations like The Southern Poverty Law Center who are fighting injustice.

Based on what little his art communicates to me, I’d venture to guess that he is a desperate psychopath looking for attention and notoriety. Therefore he should be treated as such.

SICK, SICK, SICK

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
This imbecile is not an "artist"; he is a murderer, guilty of the most heinous of crimes and deserving of jail time. Please boycott and or protest any of his exhibitions.

Art? I think not

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
This is not art, its trash. This guy needs a prison sentence, not an art exhibit. This doesn't prove anything or even reveal some horrible animal abuse going on. I've seen several articles on Abdessemed claim that his videos display "events that took place—and regularly take place—in the real world." Do people regularly tie helpless animals to a brick wall and bash them to death with sledgehammers? No, they don't. A more tasteful and appropriate project would to document footage of a slaughterhouse, or the torture of the Chinese fur trade. Why CREATE a cruel situation? What does it prove? The SF Institute of art should be ASHAMED. This man needs to be charged with a crime.

This man is no artist - he's a psychopath!!!

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 28, 2008 03:22 PM
But whom I blame more energetically and most indignantly are the so called institutions that accepted this piece of trash - to say nothing of the horrid cruelty to animals it promotes! California has mostly liberals and liberals love to justify ANYTHING WHATSOEVER for the benefit of...freedom of speech! Ignoring they are stepping on the freedom of the rest of us when they allow and even praise for godness sake the repugnant acts of brain defective jerks who pass as artists. This man should be thrown back to his own country. Let's make him go with his filth to smear his own contry. We have plenty psychos here that we don't need foreign psychos too. As to the MoMa in NYC I shall discontinue my support with a letter they'll remember forever. DOWN WITH SO CALLED ARTISTS AND THOSE WHO ACCEPT THEM!!!

Cruelty Disguised as Art

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 29, 2008 05:41 PM
The majority of comments reflect my own, in condemning this video as pure cruelty. Attaching a lofty concept or title to something doesn't change what it is, and NO work of art justifies the death of anything. EVER.
What amazes me is that any artistic group would fund this. They are as guilty of supporting animal cruelty as the artist. I strongly suggest that whatever they gave in grant money to this travesty, they donate an equal portion to an animal protection organization. It is the only way to redeem themselves.

If this is art.....

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 29, 2008 05:41 PM
Can anyone tell me when the Jeffrey Dahmer exhibit opens?

Even if it's "just" slaughter, it's still cruel

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 29, 2008 05:41 PM
This form of killing, be it for "art" or for slaughter, is cruel. While I can't tell you eating meat is wrong (that's for each person to decide for themselves), I can certainly say without hesitation that being bludgeoned to death by a hammer is wrong, regardless of its legality. There are certainly more humane slaughter methods out there.

Kill all killers till they die!!!

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
Anyone "who" would hurt or kill another living being "deserves" to die a painful, cruel death!!!! The thought of someone "actually" doing harm to an animal, a person, "a" deer, or any other human animal creature makes me want to kill "and" murder them with bombs that shoot knives that won't kill you for at least 15 minutes so you can suffer, you" animal hurting bastards!!

ps- Loved the show!

Adel Abdessemed = Sack Of Crap

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
This Guy better get out of the United States As Fast as he can. This Sack of Crap better realize this
fetish of his doesn't fly here in San Francisco. My message to Adel Abdessemed is get your mother fu**king puss bucket Arse out of our country and pull your head out of your arse -now that would be art!!!

food

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
I'll have a double bacon cheese burger with fries and a coke.

*shrugs*


Adel Abdessemed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
Shocking and disgusting. Adel Abdessemed deserves to have done to him what he has done to these animals.

Paris artist Adel Abdessemed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 07:54 PM
Adel Abdessemed better get his sorry arse out of this country as fast as he can and know that his sick
snuff fetish doesn't fly here in San Francisco. However, I would pay to see him pull his head out of his arse, now that would be art. If I could grab this bastage by the scruff of his neck I'd tar and feather him and send him on a rail strait to hell.

Ah, youth is wasted on the dead.

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 30, 2008 10:44 PM
Adel, I see what you were trying to say. It's such a deceptively simple but significant message. Perhaps more people would understand it if you take the hammer to your own head next time. And if they don't, at least I'd feel better knowing that you might have experienced some serious pain. Now that's an artist fully committed to their work, which of course you should be, committed that is.

jump to conclusions much?

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 31, 2008 06:25 PM
I originally posted this on a blog called the Discerning Brute, but I'm copy & pasting it here...I don't think I could rewrite it from scratch. I did delete one paragraph that was responding to what somebody on the other blog said and it wouldn't make sense here.

I live in San Francisco and went to the forum about it only to find out that it was cancelled when I got there. I’ll say here what I would have said there:

I’ve actually been to a farm outside of Oaxaca Mexico (these videos were shot in Mexico, according to the SF Art Institute) where they do, in fact, use sledgehammers to kill food animals. I couldn’t watch it so I never actually witnessed a killing myself. I don’t know that it was the same farm where this artist shot the footage, but this practice does actually take place. A lot of people — in fact, everyone — who opposes this exhibit has jumped to the conclusion that the artist staged it or did it himself. Knowing that the practice actually happens, I find it more believable that Mr. Abdessemed documented killings that were already taking place anyway. The framing of the shots, staging it in a gallery, and putting it up with no explanation is in large part what has caused the confusion and controversy around the exhibit. I’m not an artist, but I am an art lover, and I personally believe that part of an artists job is to make the work and leave it up to the public to draw their own conclusions, without explaining it, and trusting that the public will be smart enough to figure things out or find their own meaning. That was clearly a mistake in this case.

In any case, the exhibit has now been cancelled, and the forum scheduled to discuss it has been cancelled also because of death threats: http://www.sfai.edu/News/Ne[…]p;navID=214&sectionID=8

I’m opposed to cruelty against animals also, and was looking forward to hearing the discussion around this show. But I don’t see how death threats and racial slurs (the artist is of Arab descent, the curator of the show is Chinese) furthers the cause of animal welfare or promotes intelligent discussion. To me the people who made those threats are no better and certainly no more enlightened than the right-wing Christians who shoot doctors that perform abortions or bomb Planned Parenthood clinics. The extreme left and the extreme right really do overlap after all.

The fact that so many people jumped to so many conclusions about both the artist and this one piece of his obviously without doing any research about any of it bothers me almost — almost — as much as the video in the first place. But for the record, I never saw the video, just the stills from it.

Well said.

Posted by Anonymous User at Apr 03, 2008 05:21 PM
I would consider this the smartest comment on the whole page.

Adel Abdessemed

Posted by Anonymous User at Mar 31, 2008 06:25 PM
I hope you will not continue to support the artist Adel Abdessemed who recently produced the killing of six animals chained and clubbed to death with a sledge hammer. The exhibit is called "Don't Trust Me". This is not art but an act of cruelty.

Bad Decison

Posted by Anonymous User at Apr 01, 2008 04:25 PM
How anyone could find this artistic is beyond me. This was obviously a very bad decison on the part of the SF Art Institute. The repercussions of the SFAI decison making on students and benefactors should have been considered before they allowed the exhibit to continue. Its not the public who should be held accountable for the closure but again the bad decuison making on the part of the school to allow the exhibit. Some of these responses are a bit too exteme and that just makes the animal rights people look bad as well. I am sorry the school allowed the exhibit and when the initial response was negative they should have closed it. Being forced to close it really lays negatively on them and if i was a supporter of the school my donations woudl have quicky ceased as well. Its sad the students and others will suffer but at least students have learned a lesson here on what is acceptable art.

the lesson of acceptable art

Posted by Anonymous User at Apr 03, 2008 11:03 PM
"...when the initial response was negative they should have closed it."

"...at least students have learned a lesson here on what is acceptable art."

wow, you re a scary person...

This reenactment of medieval barbarism is not art, by no means.

Posted by Anonymous User at Apr 01, 2008 04:25 PM
Cruel. Barbaric. Simply repulsive. And so utterl